It simply wasn't in the form you cared for, so you choose to dismiss it as though it didn't happen. Sounds like rockism started a heck of a lot sooner than Seattle.Īs for the experimental part, it was happening. "Born to be Wild", "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida", "Sunshine of your Love", are hardly danceable tunes. Bands were serious, there was no room to move on the dance floor, & bands had started creating heavier music that wasn't necessarily danceable. When you note that rock had to be guitar based, had to be serious, etc., etc., you've just described something, though it's probably not what you were aiming at.Ī guitar-based music that's serious and un-danceable - you've just described the conditions in San Francisco, circa 1968. It was the symbol of early 90s rock, so it is getting blamed for rock losing its edge and its energy. And when a band like Nirvana makes the list of worst bands of the 90s, this is actually part of the reason fairly or not. But the perception that I just summarized is definitely "out there" as well. I'm certainly not saying that rock is dead or that good bands are not "out there" in the unheard hinterland. But when rock becomes nostalgia, something that is afraid of anything new, it becomes a joke. And the bands themselves didn't seem to have this idea, although the Foo Fighters sound like cranky old men nowadays. Some time ago this site linked to a poll where kids no longer identify as rock fans. It became the music of old fogeys screaming "get off my lawn." It's hard to be rebellious when you are running scared, when you are always playing to formula. Frankly it became a form scared of its own shadow, tedious, judgmental, intolerant and backward-looking. Had to reject dance rythmns (early rock was danceable). All the sudden rock had to be guitar based, had to be serious, had to jettison any sense of "inauthenticity" (all that weird 80s stuff). However grunge also gave way to a significant degree of what became known as rockism. The argument goes something like this: The 90s "grunge" bands were seemingly very fresh when compared to what was in the mainstream at the time. There, you can argue coherently why New Wave should've beat hip-hop at the pop game. The two are living proof that hip-hop was already taking over pop before that dreaded, nasty old music called rock turned up again. You should really be on a hip-hop page, ranting about this. They don't even have a connection, yet you want them to. Yet somehow, you have it worked out in your own mind that it was Rock that ruined your pop. The joy? Yes, the joy! If you are a rock fan.Īs to the irreparable harm part - how can they be doing it "irreparable harm"? They're the only ones who were playing "rock" music & succeeding at a popular mainstream level, en' masse, since the late 70's/early 80's? They're harming it by having success? begins the wave of acts that constitute the only large scale rock Music wave of the past 30+ yrs. Posted by astrodog on Monday, 05.27.13 18:04pm So next year begins the wave of 90s alt rock acts that some would argue did irreparable harm to rock music? The joy. Top 500 Albums ( ?)Įlderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town ( 1993) Inducted into Rock Hall Projected in 2017 ( ranked #45). Inducted Members: Jeff Ament, Matt Cameron, Stone Gossard, Mike McCready, Eddie Vedder, Dave Krusen Snubbed Members: Dave Abbruzzese, Jack Irons Induction Ceremony Songs: Song Rock & Roll Hall of Famer Category: Performer Inducted: 2017 Inducted by: David Letterman Nominated: 2017 First Eligible: 2017 Ceremony
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |